cb_mirror_public:responses_to_objections_sis_pages_17975

Title: Responses to Objections

Original CoS Document (slug): responses-to-objections

Login Required to view? No

Created: 2022-12-01 09:16:20

Updated: 2025-02-18 16:34:40

Published: 2022-12-07 03:00:00

Converted: 2025-04-14T20:30:19.401693342


We've heard all the opposition arguments–many times. And they all have answers. Here they are from some of our experts, in short video clips.

Opposition Argument 1: We've only had one constitutional convention, and it was a runaway. The Article V Convention isn't a safe process.

Response by Michael Farris, Esq.

https://youtu.be/BY6QnIGD4go

Opposition Argument 2: There’s no way to control a modern-day Article V Convention. They might throw out parts of the Bill of Rights or draft a whole new Constitution.

Response by Mark Meckler, Esq. 

https://youtu.be/bN1Lmjva3KY

Opposition Argument 3: A Convention is a bad idea, because Congress will just take over it. Congress will choose the delegates, set the agenda, and make the rules.

Response by The Honorable Rick Santorum, former U.S. Senator

https://youtu.be/Sfw2CYyxKaM

Opposition Argument 4: The whole problem is that the federal government doesn’t obey the Constitution, so why should we think that changing it will fix anything?

Response by Rita M. Peters, Esq.

https://youtu.be/GIgd9BjpoD0

Opposition Argument 5: We have no idea how a Convention would work, because Article V doesn’t tell us. 

Response by Rick Green, America's Constitution Coach

https://youtu.be/n82exC6zLqA

cb_mirror_public/responses_to_objections_sis_pages_17975.txt · Last modified: 2025/04/14 20:30 by 127.0.0.1

Donate Powered by PHP Valid HTML5 Valid CSS Driven by DokuWiki