User Tools

Site Tools


cb_mirror_public:a_solution_as_big_as_the_problem_pdf_files_23693

Title: A Solution As Big As The Problem

Original CoS Document (slug): a-solution-as-big-as-the-problem

Login Required to view? No

Attached File: Article1-Solution_COSA102022.pdf

A Solution As Big As The Problem By Michael Farris, JD, LL

Created: 2024-02-07 17:16:55

Updated: 2025-02-07 19:00:00

Published: 2024-02-07 03:00:00

Converted: 2025-04-14T20:15:45.729694654


background image The protection of liberty 
requires a strict adherence 
to the principle that power 
is limited and delegated.

A SOLUTION AS BIG AS THE PROBLEM

Michael P. Farris, JD, LLM, Convention of States Action — Senior Fellow for Constitutional Studies

Updated November 2022
We See Four Major Abuses Perpetrated 

by the Federal Government. 
These abuses are not mere instances of 
bad policy. They are driving us towards 
an age of “soft tyranny” in which the 
government does not shatter men’s wills 
but “softens, bends, and guides” them. 
If we do nothing to halt these abuses, we 
run the risk of becoming nothing more 
than “a flock of timid and industrious 
animals, of which the government is 
the shepherd.” (Alexis de Tocqueville, 
Democracy in America, 1840)

1. The Spending and Debt Crisis 
The national debt is staggering, but 
it only tells part of the story. Under 
standard accounting practices, the federal 
government owes trillions more invested 
Social Security benefits and other 
programs. This is why the government 
cannot tax its way out of debt. Even if it 
confiscated everything, it would not cover 
the debt.

2. The Regulatory Crisis 
The federal bureaucracy has placed a 
regulatory burden upon businesses that is 
complex, conflicted, and crushing. Little 
accountability exists when agencies—
rather than Congress—enact the real 
substance of the law. Research from the 
American Enterprise Institute shows 
that, since 1949, federal regulations have 
lowered the real GDP growth and made 
America poorer.

3. Congressional Attacks on State 

Sovereignty 
For years, Congress has been using 
federal grants to keep the states under 
its control. Combining these grants 
with federal mandates (which are rarely 
fully funded), Congress has turned state 
legislatures into their regional agencies 
rather than respecting them as truly 
independent republican governments. 

A radical social agenda and an invasion of 

the rights of the people accompany all of 
this. While significant efforts have been 
made to combat this social erosion, these 
trends defy some of the most important 
principles.

4. Federal Takeover of the Decision-

Making Process 
The Founders believed that the 
structures of a limited government 
would provide the greatest protection of 
liberty. Not only were there to be checks 

and balances between the branches of 
the federal government, but power was 
to be shared between the states and 
federal government, with the latter only 
exercising those powers specifically 
granted in the Constitution. 

Collusion among decision-makers in 
Washington, D.C., has replaced these 
checks and balances. The federal judi-
ciary supports Congress and the White 
House in their ever escalating attack upon 
the jurisdiction of the fifty states. 

We need to realize that the structure of 
decision-making matters. Who decides 
what the law shall be is as important as 
what is decided. The protection of liberty 
requires a strict adherence to the principle 
that power is limited and delegated. 

Washington, D.C., does not believe in this 
principle, as evidenced by an unbroken 
practice of expanding the boundaries 
of federal power. In a remarkably frank 
admission, the Supreme Court rebuffed 
a challenge to federal spending power, 
despite acknowledging that power had 
grown far beyond the bounds envisioned 
by the Founders. 

What Does this Mean?
This is not a partisan issue. Washington, 
D.C., will never voluntarily relinquish 
meaningful power—no matter who is 

Continued on back page 

background image elected. The only rational conclusion is 
this: Unless some political force outside 
of Washington, D.C., intervenes, the fed-
eral government will continue to bank-
rupt this nation, embezzle the legitimate 
authority of the states, and destroy the 
liberty of the people. Rather than secur-
ing the blessings of liberty for future gen-
erations, Washington, D.C., is on a path 
that will enslave our children and grand-
children to the debts of the past. The 
problem is big, but we have a solution. 
Article V gives us a tool to fix the mess 
in D.C.

Our Solution Is Big Enough to Solve the 
Problem
Rather than calling a convention for 
a specific amendment, Convention of 
States Action (COSA) urges state legisla-
tures to properly use Article V to call a 
convention for a particular subject—re-
ducing the power of Washington, D.C. 
It is important to note that a conven-
tion for an individual amendment (e.g., 
a Balanced Budget Amendment) would 
be limited to that single idea. Requiring 
a balanced budget is a great idea that 
COSA fully supports. Congress, howev-

er, could comply with a Balanced Budget 
Amendment by simply raising taxes. We 
need spending restraints as well. We need 
restraints on taxation. We need prohibi-
tions against improper federal regulation. 
We need to stop unfunded mandates.

A Convention of States needs to be called 
to ensure that we are able to debate and 
impose a complete package of restraints 
on the misuse of power by all branches of 
the federal government. 

What Sorts of Amendments Could Be 
Passed?
 
The following are examples of amend-
ment topics that could be discussed at a 
convention of states:

 • A Balanced Budget Amendment  
• A redefinition of the General Welfare Clause 
(the original view was that the federal gov-
ernment could not spend money on any topic 
within the jurisdiction of the states) 
 • A redefinition of the Commerce Clause (the 
original view was that Congress was granted a 
narrow and exclusive power to regulate ship-
ments across state lines–not all the economic 
activity of the nation) 

• A prohibition on using international treaties 
and law to govern the domestic law of the 
United States
• A limitation on using executive orders and 
federal regulations to enact laws (since Con-
gress is supposed to be the exclusive agency 
to enact laws)
• Imposing term limits on Congress and the 
Supreme Court
• Placing an upper limit on federal taxation
• Requiring the sunset of all existing federal 
taxes and a super-majority vote to replace 
them with new, fairer taxes

 
Of course, these are merely examples of 
what would be up for discussion. The 
Convention of States itself would deter-
mine which ideas deserve serious consid-
eration, and it would take a majority of 
votes from the states to formally propose 
any amendments.

The Founders gave us a legitimate 
path to save our liberty by using our 
state governments to impose binding 
restraints on the federal government. 
We must use the power granted to the 
states in the Constitution.

 

(540) 441-7227 | COSACTION.COM | Facebook.com/COSAction | Twitter.com/COSAction

Founders gave us a 
legitimate path to save our 
liberty. We must use the 
power granted to the states 
in the Constitution.

cb_mirror_public/a_solution_as_big_as_the_problem_pdf_files_23693.txt · Last modified: 2025/04/14 20:15 by 127.0.0.1

Donate Powered by PHP Valid HTML5 Valid CSS Driven by DokuWiki