Title: It has been 1 year since Gov. Gavin Newsome (D Ca.) declared an Article V convention of states to propose amendments the safe and secure way to amend the Constitution! Original CoS Document (slug): [[https://conventionofstates.com/it-has-been-1-year-since-gov-gavin-newsome-d-ca-declared-an-article-v-convention-of-states-to-propose-amendments-the-safe-and-secure-way-to-amend-the-constitution|it-has-been-1-year-since-gov-gavin-newsome-d-ca-declared-an-article-v-convention-of-states-to-propose-amendments-the-safe-and-secure-way-to-amend-the-constitution]] Login Required to view? No Created: 2024-06-10 09:05:22 Updated: 2024-06-13 05:09:32 Published: 2024-06-10 00:00:00 Converted: 2025-04-14T21:30:53.601560635 ---- [[https://conventionofstates.com/news/gov-gavin-newsome-d-ca-declares-article-v-convention-is-the-safe-and-secure-way-to-amend-the-constitution|**It has been one year since Gov. Newsome announced his plan to call an Article V convention of states to propose amendments for gun control.**]] **For decades**, the opposition's tactics for calling an //**Article V**// convention of states to propose amendments to the Constitution have been identical for every attempt. **Fan the flames of fear!** The myths the left uses to stoke those flames of fear:  * there has never been an Article V convention of states, so it is untested, * no one knows what could happen,  * the scope can't be limited * we don't know how they work, and  * state legislatures can't control the delegates they send to convention are all offshoots of their favorite taradiddle—the **1787 Philadelphia Convention** was a //**"runaway."**// This premise is the //**"Holy Grail**//" of their staunch opposition (they even invented a boogeyman to promulgate their agenda, **"Con-Con,"** and it is all the proof they need to proclaim **Convention of States Action** is trying to destroy the Constitution and system of government because we secretly know the convention can't be controlled and we have a hidden agenda we will impose on the unsuspecting people. The **COSA PA Comms Team** thought comparing how these two separate grassroots organizations have been treated might be worthwhile. An internet search of "//[[https://www.bing.com/search?q=gavin+newsome+article+v+convention+on+gun+control&form=QBLH&sp=-1&ghc=1&lq=0&pq=gavin+newsome+article+v+convention+on+gun+control&sc=0-49&qs=n&sk=&cvid=C58EE01C304E4B14B4635250ECE42F6B&ghsh=0&ghacc=0&ghpl=|Gov. Newsome's Article V convention on gun contro]]l//" returned 72,600 hits. The stories are about why this idea hasn't gained traction one year later. [[https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/a-year-after-newsom-called-for-constitutional-amendment-on-gun-safety-no-other-states-have-joined-him/ar-BB1nTqFt?ocid=msedgntp&pc=HCTS&cvid=d4f8558bd8e04ae0b8389cc569604169&ei=14|The LA Times article]] seems to suggest that this great idea is facing an uphill battle against the dangerous "Gun Lobby."  **If I may ask just one question, where are the articles critical of the idea because it is dangerous and the outcome cannot be controlled?** **What** are the positions of JBS, The Eagle Forum, FOAC, The Daily Caller, Daily KOS, Mother Jones, CNN, MSNBC, and the rest of the mainstream media? Am I that much of a cynic to think the opposition **COSA** faces is based on ideology and politics and not a sincere desire to protect our system of government? Where are all the haters? To quote //**"The National Enquirer"**// - [[https://conventionofstates.com/?ref=42726|Enquiring Minds Want to Know ...]]